High death rates, an enormous number of runaway slaves, and greater levels of manumission granting a slave freedom meant that Latin America and Caribbean societies had fewer slaves than the United States at any given time.
However they made up a higher percentage of the population throughout the colonial period. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. Social studies. Ben Davis November 9, Why do you think he was called the Washington of South America? How is George Washington like Simon Bolivar? Was George Washington inspired by Simon Bolivar? He was helpful because he gave independence to six countries and helped unknown people to freedom from the Spanish.
Simon Bolivar died on December 17, , but his name lives on as he is called the 'George Washington of South America' today because of his accomplishments. Subsequently, question is, what influenced Simon Bolivar? He fought over battles in his military career. He established one—Bolivia—in the region formerly known as Upper Peru Simon Bolivar — was a Venezuelan military and political leader who was instrumental in helping Latin American countries achieve independence from the Spanish Empire.
Later as president of Gran Colombia, he sought to imitate some of these democratic ideals and create a federation of Latin American states.
In , the "Republic of Bolivia" was created in honor of the inspirational leader, hailed by many as El Libertador The Liberator. He died on December 17, in Colombia. From , Bolivar led troops against Spanish rule. He fought for freedom in lands that are now Venezuela, Colombia , and Panama. He became a dictator and wanted to establish one large country called Gran Colombia.
Bolivar wanted to unit the Spanish colonies in South America into a single nation that would share resources and a common government to avoid conflict and promote wealth. Foreign powers Spain, Britain have been attacking Haiti. Gran Colombia was dissolved in due to the political differences that existed between supporters of federalism and centralism, as well as regional tensions among the peoples that made up the republic.
It broke into the successor states of Colombia , Ecuador, and Venezuela; Panama was separated from Colombia in Bolivar , a brilliant military tactician who liberated much of the continent of South America from centuries of Spanish rule, died at the age of 47 in Santa Marta, Colombia on Dec 17, When he died he was on his way to exile in Europe having survived an assassination attempt less than two years earlier.
However, Spain regained control of the country by July of He was the first to fall. He had charged before anyone else and was killed before anyone else.
Across from him was a wan young woman, staring at him day after day in that living room. She turned out to be the daughter of the Spanish brigadier general.
She was born after he was killed, because when he went off to fight that battle, his wife had been expecting her. That wistful young woman ended up marrying the third person on the wall, a young patriot soldier who also had fought at the battle of Ayacucho. Which is to say, he fought against the Spanish general, and married his daughter sixteen years later. So here I am, this child of warring factions. It happened in the United States with families that fought the Civil War on both sides.
But for me, it was a very visible and present thing. I saw those faces every day and they fascinated me. The battle of Ayacucho became a mythic event for me. And so, Bolivar was very much on my mind as I grew up, as was the Argentine independence leader Jose de San Martin, and the whole business of revolution even into the twentieth century. Everyone was aware of how Spanish you were or how Peruvian you were. Nobody here talks about how English or American you are.
Lafayette admired Bolivar and they corresponded. He loved being called the George Washington of South America.
But Bolivar was a polar opposite of George Washington. I never grew up thinking he was anything like Washington. He was as singular a figure as George Washington. And Bolivar was not particularly loved in Peru. In the process of writing this biography, I have come to admire and respect him. But I grew up in a country that resented him because, in the course of liberating Peru, he actually reduced it.
Before the revolution, Peru was grand and sprawling. It had been the heart of South America when it was a colony. It was rich and important, the power center of the empire. Bolivar called Peru the land of gold and slaves. But when Bolivar liberated Peru, he shrank it.
Peru went from being a great hub to being a republic among many others, and its power was reduced drastically. Certainly my father was not a fan of Bolivar. So he went begging to Bolivar, and Bolivar essentially said that there was not room for both of them in Peru. What are some of the salient things North Americans should know about Bolivar? Thank you so much. The one thing to remember is that these two regions sprang from very different histories, very different territories.
The revolution fought here over the rolling landscape of New England and the Mid-Atlantic was very different from the revolution fought in South America. First of all, the South American territory was seven times the size, and included jungles, steamy tropical rivers and the Andes with its impossible, snow-capped promontories. The Spanish colonial system was so much more entrenched than the English colonial system in early America.
It had existed much longer with laws that lasted for centuries -- harsh and limiting laws. That history created a very different kind of person than the North American.
That is what I want to be understood. The Hispanic personality is defined in a very different way than American history defined early Americans. Race is an important aspect of the story you tell. Bolivar eventually recruited Indians and mixed race people to his ranks and abolished slavery in , almost a half century before abolition in the United States.
Race was a huge part of the wars of independence. The wars could not have been fought and won without engaging all of the races. That was not true in North America where it was as if we pushed race aside and carried on the revolution with race outside the picture. By the time the wars of independence began in Latin America, it was a cauldron of years of race mixing even though there had been strict laws to keep the races separate. You were fined if you were darker. You had to pay fines or taxes if you were black or Indian, either by producing gold or currency or by enslaving yourself for a while to pay off the debt.
So it was a very harsh system. We are often more knowledgeable than the Spanish who are sent here to rule us. They were very much like the United States founders in that respect. It took Bolivar three times to get it going. Bolivar understood that so profoundly that, after his exile, he said it was clear that he had to emancipate the slaves and get all the races on his side. As far as he was concerned, the enemy was Spain and every color of man needed to unite against that enemy force.
Spain, in fact, had been trying to get the slaves to oppose the revolution, but Bolivar managed to win many of them to his side. In some respects, South Americans are ignorant of this fact.
It was a confusing time for the Church and institutionally they knew they had to stick with Spain. At that time, Spain was the most Catholic nation in the world, and certainly the most successful in spreading the Catholic faith.
0コメント